Per a thorough review of election regulations, not a single election voting machine in the 2020 Election was certified by an accredited voting machine company according to US law.
The issue of whether US voting machines and voting machine auditors were properly accredited leading up to and after the 2020 Election has been previously addressed by The Gateway Pundit. We first addressed this issue when the Maricopa County leadership only wanted a ‘certified auditor’ to perform an audit of their operations after the 2020 Election in Arizona. The County selected two firms and TGP pointed out that the two firms selected were not properly certified at the time they were claimed to be by Maricopa officials. Only hours after our report, the Election Assistance Commission (EAC) suspiciously certified the two firms we identified.
Voting laws changed in the US in 2002 after the 2000 Election:
The Help America Vote Act (HAVA) of 2002 was passed by the United States Congress to make sweeping reforms to the nation’s voting process. HAVA addresses improvements to voting systems and voter access that were identified following the 2000 election. Read the Help America Vote Act of 2002
HAVA creates new mandatory minimum standards for states to follow in several key areas of election administration. The law provides funding to help states meet these new standards, replace voting systems and improve election administration. HAVA also established the Election Assistance Commission (EAC) to assist the states regarding HAVA compliance and to distribute HAVA funds to the states. EAC is also charged with creating voting system guidelines and operating the federal government’s first voting system certification program.
HAVA directed the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to support the EAC in its accreditation of laboratories:
The Help America Vote Act (HAVA) of 2002 directs the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to support the U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) in its accreditation of laboratoriesqualified to conduct the testing, certification, decertification, and recertification of voting systems as provided under the act. NIST processes for carrying out this responsibility are as open and transparentas possible to facilitate the public’s understanding of how laboratories that test voting systems are evaluated.
When the NIST evaluates laboratories to assess whether they can be accredited or not, the NIST relies on the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) to determine competency. An on-site review of the lab is to take place and the lab is to demonstrate competency in performing multiple tasks in a voting system review.
”READ FULL ARTICLE HERE: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/05/exclusive-based-thorough-review-election-regulations-not-single-voting-system-testing-lab-used-2020-election-accredited-based-law-part/
”ALL THE PROOF YOU NEED TO KNOW THAT THIS WAS AN ELECTION FRAUD. ITS NOT ROCKET SCIENCE THE QUESTION IS, WHEN WILL BIDEN GET OUT OF OFFICE? MAYBE TOWARDS MIDTERMS OR THE END OF THE YEAR TO FIND OUT.
About Author
